social change

2011 Stonehouse Standing Circle Meeting

Communication experts, psychologists, academics, activists, politicians, theologians, bloggers, scientists and corporate consultants in environment/leadership all came together at the 2011 Stonehouse Standing Circle to take a deep dive into the human mind and motivations behind our failure to get climate back on the public agenda.

The Social Capital Project Announces New Report on American Climate Attitudes, New Online Resource

The Social Capital Project of the Resource Innovation Group has just announced the release of a new report entitled American Climate Attitudes. The report provides analysis of public opinion trends and recommendations for climate practitioners regarding communication and engagement.

The Art and Craft of Social Change

Marshall Ganz is a Lecturer in Public Policy at the Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government. Renowned labor organizer, he is known for organizing the California farm worker movement, and more recently, for playing an instrumental role behind Barack Obama’s electoral campaign. In this 2009 article, he discusses the power of narrative strategy and the ‘story of self’ in developing broad and transformative social movements.

As we explore how to create tipping points, Ganz’s message about communicating values through stories is a critical one to keep in mind.

Common Cause: Report argues that communication campaigns should strengthen our values

Common Cause: The Case for Working with our Cultural Values: In confronting the profound challenges of our times, civil society organizations can find common cause in working to activate and strengthen a set of helpful 'intrinsic' values, while working to diminish the importance of unhelpful 'extrinsic' values.

"Scientists React to Nobelist's Climate Thoughts"

A variety of scientists immersed in research on the human influence on climate sent reactions to a pair of central elements in the earlier post — a climate essay in The American Scholar by Robert Laughlin, a Nobel laureate in physics, and a related commentary on Laughlin’s piece by George Will

Do Americans' Actions Speak Louder than Words on Energy & Climate?

Dear Friends,

Today we are releasing our latest report: Americans’ Actions to Conserve Energy, Reduce Waste, and Limit Global Warming. In brief, we found that there is a significant gap between Americans’ conservation attitudes and their actual behaviors. For example:

Americans Support Strong Climate and Energy Policies

Dear Friends,
 
Today we are releasing the second wave of results from our recent national survey. This report finds that, despite the recent drops in public beliefs and concern about global warming, a large majority of Americans—regardless of political affiliation—support the passage of federal climate and energy policies. These include support for:

Apocalypse Fatigue: Losing the Public on Climate Change

You may not like what these guys have to say but at least they are exploring THE toughest climate change question "why after decades of public education and the growth of scientific certainty aren't we doing something to fix climate change?"

How to Communicate About Climate Change

Two Stonehouse members have recently contributed to new, evidence-based guides for communicating about global warming – two documents that have the capacity to make major advances in the integrity and efficacy of the conversation about climate change.

The first of these documents comes from the Center for Research on Environmental Decisions (CRED) at Columbia University in New York. Entitled The Psychology of Climate Change Communicationsit is framed as “a guide for scientists, journalists, educators, political aides and the interested public.” Stonehouse scholar Anthony Leiserowitz, Director of the Yale Project on Climate Change, was a leading contributor.

The second document, penned in part by Stonehouse scholar and former Earthjustice communications VP Cara Pike, is called Climate Crossroads: A Research-Based Framing Guide,offered “for global warming advocates; from global warming advocates.”

 

It’s clear that both papers have been extensively researched. The CRED paper, written by Debika Shome and Sabine Marx, arises more from an academic tradition, while the Climate Crossroadsdocument is a compilation of the learning of a host of environmental organizations. In fact, the contributors’ list is a who’s who of climate change activism, ranging from gold-standard traditional environmental organizations like Greenpeace and the Sierra Club to newer climate-focused groups like 1 Sky and 350.org. So, while the CRED paper is more theoretical in its approach, with some of its excellent advice originating in careful experiments and labs, the Climate Crossroads material is more likely to be experience-based – although a goodly amount has also been focus-group tested. In both papers, this is clearly information you can rely on.

 

A final rough distinction between the two papers is that CRED talks more about how to communicate about climate change, while Climate Crossroads spends more time offering arguments and suggestions for what to communicate, even at the (acknowledged) risk of offering advice that might time out if not acted on promptly.

 

Syndicate content
© StoneHouse      Terms of Use | Privacy PolicyContact | Help | Newsletter signup